Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Boodsy's avatar

It is not easy to distinguish the relative importance of user data over innovation in Google's success. As Hal Varian, Google's chief economist once commented, ‘every action a user performs is considered a signal to be analyzed and fed back into the system.’ It is the innovative use of such user signals that have improved search results. Saying that Google gained advantage from a larger sample size of user data is questionable. It is quite possible that similar innovations could be gained from smaller collections of user data, such as those available to other Search engines such as DuckDuckGo.

LLMs such as Bert are trained with scraped data, but refined later with user data (e.g. analyzing feedback on results produced).

What is more pertinent is the line of questioning examining the default access to Google search within user devices. Why would any average user change the default search engine (Google) if it does the job. Even if the ability to change search engines is easily there, why bother?

Expand full comment
Chip's avatar

Let's not forget little Neeva! Who are they? If you know, congratulations, I'll bet you miss them too. If you don't know who they were I have only one comment. "Exactly" and that's the point.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts