Fill in the <blanks>; these being redactions in the pre-trial brief:
1. Google’s <blank> with <blank> prevents <blank> from pre-setting a different, more private search engine (e.g., <blank>) as its default <blank>.
2. Google's partners-including OEMS, carriers, and Apple-wanted more flexibility than what they ultimately received under their contracts with Google. In particular, <blank> bristled repeatedly at the <blank> restrictive nature ..... For example, in <blank>, <blank> sought to offer <blank>. Google refused.
3. Browsers also took issue with Google’s restrictive terms. For example, <blank> sought an alternative to Google and signed a contract with <blank> to encourage competition in search, welcoming the <blank> to <blank>. However, the trial testimony will show that to win the <blank> default from Google in 2014, <blank> needed to offer a <blank> million annual financial guarantee—roughly <blank> million more than Google was paying for the <blank> default. <blank>
Looking forward to 'watching' this - I've closely followed only a few trials in my lifetime, and the absence of direct video or audio will make it harder to do, but it could still be a compelling enough story to stay tuned.
Looking forward to this, but you really absolutely need to use another color scheme, this one is very unfriendly to the eye.
White text on beige background is totally illegible
Fill in the <blanks>; these being redactions in the pre-trial brief:
1. Google’s <blank> with <blank> prevents <blank> from pre-setting a different, more private search engine (e.g., <blank>) as its default <blank>.
2. Google's partners-including OEMS, carriers, and Apple-wanted more flexibility than what they ultimately received under their contracts with Google. In particular, <blank> bristled repeatedly at the <blank> restrictive nature ..... For example, in <blank>, <blank> sought to offer <blank>. Google refused.
3. Browsers also took issue with Google’s restrictive terms. For example, <blank> sought an alternative to Google and signed a contract with <blank> to encourage competition in search, welcoming the <blank> to <blank>. However, the trial testimony will show that to win the <blank> default from Google in 2014, <blank> needed to offer a <blank> million annual financial guarantee—roughly <blank> million more than Google was paying for the <blank> default. <blank>
I mean one guy deciding the outcome of millions of dollars spent and hours and hours of work and etc etc etc, seems crazy.
Really insightful.
Terrific opening article...
Looking forward to 'watching' this - I've closely followed only a few trials in my lifetime, and the absence of direct video or audio will make it harder to do, but it could still be a compelling enough story to stay tuned.