6 Comments
User's avatar
Mitchell, Russ's avatar

Looking forward to this, but you really absolutely need to use another color scheme, this one is very unfriendly to the eye.

Expand full comment
Shakeel's avatar

White text on beige background is totally illegible

Expand full comment
Colin Hayhurst's avatar

Fill in the <blanks>; these being redactions in the pre-trial brief:

1. Google’s <blank> with <blank> prevents <blank> from pre-setting a different, more private search engine (e.g., <blank>) as its default <blank>.

2. Google's partners-including OEMS, carriers, and Apple-wanted more flexibility than what they ultimately received under their contracts with Google. In particular, <blank> bristled repeatedly at the <blank> restrictive nature ..... For example, in <blank>, <blank> sought to offer <blank>. Google refused.

3. Browsers also took issue with Google’s restrictive terms. For example, <blank> sought an alternative to Google and signed a contract with <blank> to encourage competition in search, welcoming the <blank> to <blank>. However, the trial testimony will show that to win the <blank> default from Google in 2014, <blank> needed to offer a <blank> million annual financial guarantee—roughly <blank> million more than Google was paying for the <blank> default. <blank>

Expand full comment
Heidi Johnston's avatar

I mean one guy deciding the outcome of millions of dollars spent and hours and hours of work and etc etc etc, seems crazy.

Expand full comment
Naor Weitzman's avatar

Really insightful.

Expand full comment
hw's avatar

Terrific opening article...

Expand full comment