Thank you for excellent reporting of the trial. Do not know the full testimony, though it should be noted that if Virginia Tech computer science professor Edward Fox "did not study what accounts for the remaining 97% of the quality gap" then for all practical purposes the "study" must be considered *results manufacturing* and not a *study* as the only informative thing it offered was that the "study" was extremely narrowly defined to prove what Google wanted to hear. Therefore we should all applaud Judge Mehta's question, "if user data is of such limited value to Google, then why does Google pay to store so much of it?", as it elegantly points out the true intent of the "study"
I don't quite know what to say about using Google Drive to host the exhibits.
Absurd!
It’s like we can’t live with them and we can’t live without them...
Thank you for excellent reporting of the trial. Do not know the full testimony, though it should be noted that if Virginia Tech computer science professor Edward Fox "did not study what accounts for the remaining 97% of the quality gap" then for all practical purposes the "study" must be considered *results manufacturing* and not a *study* as the only informative thing it offered was that the "study" was extremely narrowly defined to prove what Google wanted to hear. Therefore we should all applaud Judge Mehta's question, "if user data is of such limited value to Google, then why does Google pay to store so much of it?", as it elegantly points out the true intent of the "study"
Whose gonna be hurt by this court case?
Google or Apple or both?
I lost respect for Sundar when I learned a year or so ago that he worked at McKinsey.
https://rb.gy/6jjap
I thought he had a technical background. I guess not.
Thank you for the amazing reporting.
It might be worth taking a look at Gregg shorthand and DocumentCloud.
Omg, Fox, another phd lackey for sale. Hired gun
In the 10/31 update the link " https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-10/417451_0.pdf) " is inop. I tried to search the DOJ website to no avail.