Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Angie M.'s avatar

Thank you for explaining everything in easy-to-understand terms!! Keep up the great work!

Expand full comment
Tommy's avatar

Another great post. It's a complicated market to understand, but you have broken it down effectively. I wasn't sure what part of the Sherman Act this case was being tied with; thanks for tying that in at the start.

IBM, and AT&T had increased value because of competitive enforcement. With Google's current reliance on nearly complete control of the search and ad business, losing its dominance of information could take down the whole company. Does anyone have a guess on what will happen to Google's business if they are broken up? This seems especially important, considering their current leadership is an accumulation of uninspired business hacks. How could they ever build back value?

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts